Helping small businesses and assistance providers access environmental compliance and sustainable business information
Measurement Subcommittee
Measurement Subcommittee

The Multimedia Subcommittee is one of six subcommittees created by the National Steering Committee. 

Overall Mission
History
Future Plans
Subcommittee Members
Resources
Search the Performance Measurement Tools and Success Stories Database
Go to Performance Measurement Sessions (SBO/SBEAP National Conferences)
Go to Performance Measurement web page--home


Next conference call:
Thursday, September 9, 2010
2:00 pm EST


Overall Mission
The overall mission/purpose of the measurement subcommittee is to work cooperatively to support the SBO/SBEAP National Steering Committee, improve SBEAP measurement information, training, and resources, and respond to SBEAP measurement needs in a timely manner. 

History
The measurement subcommittee was initiated as a result of the Working Session at the 2004 SBO/SBAP National Conference in Sacramento, California.  At the 2005 National Conference in Biloxi, Mississippi, there was a renewed interest in the measurement subcommittee considering the current issues with multimedia assistance and the efforts of the promotional subcommittee.  The subcommittee has completed the development of a Nationwide Logic Model and common measures from the Logic Model with the assistance of the EPA National Center for Environmental Innovation's Evaluation Support Division (NCEI ESD).  The models were presented at the 2006 SBO/SBEAP National Conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire.  In 2006, the subcommittee conducted a nationwide survey of measures designed to gauge interest in measurement as a whole and provide a mechanism for prioritizing the host of measures identified by the logic models.  From the survey results, the subcommittee developed a set of core measures and worked with EPA's Office of Small Business Ombudsman to propose changes to the Information Collection Request (ICF) in 2007.  In May 2008, the subcommittee received word that the changes were not accepted.  EPA is working on a response to OMB's comments.

Future Plans
Future plans include:  1) identifying outcome measures for data gathering in 2010, as a supplement to the Annual Reporting Form, 2) developing a tracking tool to assist with annual reporting, and 3) working cooperatively with other subcommittees to incorporate measurement issues.

Subcommittee Members
The following are current members of the Performance Measurement Subcommittee.  For more information or to get involved, please contact Julie Churchill, Chair. 

Renee Lesjak Bashel 608-264-6153 renee.bashel@wisconsin.gov 
David Carter 785-532-4998 dcarter@ksu.edu
Julie Churchill (Chair) 207-287-7881 julie.m.churchill@maine.gov
Phyllis Copeland 803-896-8982 copelapt@dhec.sc.gov
Nancy Crickman 215-746-6473 crickman@wharton.upenn.edu
Sara Johnson 603-271-1379 sara.johnson@des.nh.gov
Troy Johnson 651-296-7767 troy.johnson@state.mn.us
Carl Komassa 414-272-0064 ctkomassa6159@att.net
Judy Mirro 802-241-3745 judy.mirro@state.vt.us  
Elizabeth Sapio 303-692-2135 elizabeth.sapio@state.co.us
Kenya Stump 502-564-0323, x134 kenya.stump@ky.gov 
Angela Suber 202-566-2827 suber.angela@epa.gov
Audrey G. Zelanko 724-452-4722 zelanko@smallbiz-enviroweb.org

Resources
Below are minutes from conference calls and other resources.

7/22/10 Conference Call Minutes
Industry Sector Measurement Data Survey (April 2010)
2/11/10 Conference Call Minutes
11/12/09 Conference Call Minutes
7/20/05 Conference Call Minutes

HELPFUL WEB SITES

Questionnaire Design and Surveys Sampling, Survey Design, Survey & Questionnaire Design
SBEAP Recommended Performance Measures (2007)
Measurement Subcommittee Example Pilot Measures Evaluation/Survey (Compliance Assistance Outcome Evaluation)
Letter Requesting SBO/SBEAP Directors to Complete July 2006 Survey (click on 2006 SBEAP National Conference Presentation below to review as requested in letter)
SBEAP Measurement, Kenya Stump and Yvonne Watson (3/27/06 NH SBO/SBEAP National Conference)
SBEAP Draft Measures (3/06)
Small Business Ombudsman Logic Model (3/06)
Compliance Advisory Panel Logic Model (3/06)
Compliance and Technical Assistance Program Logic Model (3/06)
Making the Case: Measuring Performance
Evaluation Support:  Program Evaluation Planning Worksheet
Things to Consider When Undertaking a Program Evaluation

 
 

For web site questions, contact:
Audrey Graylin Zelanko  -    -  724.452.4722

This web site is maintained by and AGZ & Associates, LLC
and is funded by the